Why not Ringnecks? I am not arguing against your advice, just merely asking why, based on my limited experience with them. My mom had one as her last bird after she had to give up her breeders due to lung problems, and eventually her death. It seemed like most other nice smaller birds. Educate me on them a bit further.
I have reservations about recommending a Lovebird. I raised Masked Lovebirds, but it was many years ago, so my memory is a bit fuzzy. I also did not have as much experience then as I do now. My memory of them is that they were never quite the same or as handleable as your typical Cockatiel, Conure and other species, even as handfed babies. They also seemed to require a lot of constant handling to remain at their best.
Danny
Pajarita wrote:Breeders did not invent hand-feeding as a way of getting rid of babies sooner, they invented it so the bird imprints to humans and is not deadly afraid of it. Wild birds don't want anything to do with humans because they learned from their parents that humans are predators.
Linnies, budgies and tiels are good. Lovies and plets are more difficult and, if I were you, I would not consider ringnecks at all. As to rescue versus babies, I think that rescue birds always turn out better for first time owners than babies because they don't have to be weaned, they left puberty behind and, what you see is what you get in terms of temperament which makes them much easier and predictable for somebody who doesn't have a whole lot of experience in parrots.