by Dodes151 » Wed Aug 28, 2013 8:03 pm
I'm not used to people throwing around the word "retarded" when talking about parrots. Honestly, I think it's a bit insensitive to do so regardless of the context. The kakaPO (not poo) is critically endangered because of introduced predators like cats and opossums. Man certainly has had an effect on their population in the past (killing them for meat and hats), but it was the non-human predators that really did them in. And they lost their ability to fly because of the initial LACK of predators. Meaning, there was not a need to fly, so fly they did not. So, clearly, when given the option, they chose NOT to fly. Like MOST parrots will every single time. Parrots ARE lazy compared to other families. That's not a slight against them, it's a survival instinct. Those cockatoos or budgies or macaws would not fly miles a day if they didn't have to. That is a guarantee. "Spending time in trees" was never a factor. I never mentioned it.
Look, believe what you like in regards to wing clipping. If you're in a situation where you are justified to take the many potential risks that come with having a fully flighted bird, then by all means. But I have a problem when all I see on this forum is people getting blasted for doing what they feel is best for their bird. And I've seen Michael's videos. I've shown them off in the past! I think he's done an awesome job with his birds. But I don't believe he's a god, and I won't take advice blindly from anyone. I don't think the average parrot owner should keep their birds flighted. It is dangerous. I've owned parrots my entire life. I've worked with them professionally for over a decade. I've seen parrots DIE because they were not properly clipped. I've seen others fly away, never to return. I'm sure they wanted to, but a native accipiter had other plans for them. I've seen them have doors slammed on them, break mandibles, hit ceiling fans, etc. You can make the argument that some of those situations could have been avoided, but shit happens. To everyone. You are not excluded from Murphy's law.
In my own experience, I've never known of a bird that's taken physical or psychological damage (or "retardation") from wing clips. Many of the claims ive read on this forum about the subject seemto be based on presumptions, inexperience, and wishful thinking. I could be wrong. And again, they're your birds. Do what you will to them. But don't insult others for having a different opinion.