by Grey_Moon » Tue Oct 16, 2012 7:47 am
Break it down like this, this is what they taught me to do at the mytoos forum I'm part of (don't own a too obviously but I really enjoy and appreciate all the advice they give that comes from working with all manners of toos).
Its the Applied Behaviour Analysis approach thing.
So break down the encounters like this ABC style:
Antecedent---what happens before?
Behaviour----what does the bird do?
Consequence---what happens after?
IF you look at it as a confusing, overwhelming whole then it becomes nearly impossible to target the issue and modify/avoid/prevent it.
So what I'm seeing is:
A) Eurycerus asks Nika to/Nika is...
B) (this is probably what your missing---there is probably very slight body language prior to the bite) Nika bites
C) Eurycerus puts Nika down
From this I see that she doesn't want to be on your hand/is uncomfortable with whats going on. The biting after you set her down I've seen before with Jacko when she's trying to defend herself/drive me off. Its hard not to reinforce because in putting her down to get away from the bite you are giving her what she wants. So the biting is working for her.
You need to figure out how to avoid triggering her and setting up the whole scenario. Whether thats targeting her back into the cage instead of putting her in there, or teaching her to step up on a stick. Also give her choice and don't make her feel trapped. Also avoid triggering that B that ends up with the C that's so rewarding.
Instead, set up a new A, so you encourage new B and then a new, more positive C that you reinforce.

---
Jacko (13 year old TAG rescue and my little turkey-bird girl

)
"Love me, Love my parrots"