by GMV » Thu Sep 25, 2014 11:18 am
Well, I can give you guys everything Is perfect at something, but that would include mankind. And if its all about perception, im sure someone percieves mankind as perfect, so does that make us perfect? Isis is the perfect isis, delights the perfect delight, mankind is the perfect mankind, evil is the perfect evil, good is the perfect good, but no matter the greatness in something it will always be flawed at one thing. this world is flawed at surviving humanity, humanity is flawed at treating the world. How do people define perfect???
"Flawless at everything and every aspect"?
"Always ends up with the best possible outcome for life or space"?
"Created by god/gods"?
We all know "just right" comes to mind, but just right at what? Everything? If you're just right at knowing all, you can't be just right at failing to know all. In that case you could say you could know how to not know all, but then you would not be perfect at knowing all and not be able to lose your knowledge. That can apply to win win situations, too.
That's only one definition of perfect, so I'm not saying thats the truth about perfect at all, but it is about the "good at everything" definition.
I understand that might come across as confusing.
I think we are thinking of different "perfects"?
Maybe we are on the wrong page altogether.