by patti » Mon Feb 09, 2015 11:30 pm
I thought this was really interesting, and agree that a research thread might be a great idea. I specialize in social analysis of humans and could maybe contribute in a year or so once my life settles down.
One thing i thought was interesting was that aggression was part of the social structure only in the captive birds. It says this in the write-up, but you can tell from the video that this researcher seemed to have generalized this finding to the birds in general.... i hope not. This difference could be a very important finding and shouldn't be glossed over.
this makes me wonder about the importance assigned to aggression, too. I would need more convincing. Humans tend to romanticize aggression, and I hope that the research team is not doing that here. They are equating social structure with heirarchy of dominance/submissive relationships. Like reseachers do with all animals. I suspect that it is really we humans that make dominance structures central to our social lives. As pajarita said in an earlier post, parrots have a capacity for love that we humans do not understand. That is what is important.
Network analysis quantifies connections between birds - lines and dots with attached descriptors - but gives little qualitative information. Birds are smart, and their interactions have shared meanings that probably structure the interaction and their whole lives more than just simple bonding and biting. Someone needs to call in Segourney Weaver with her notebook and hiking boots. just sayin.