Greg wrote:It took me a long time to read all those links. Not one of them even applies to baby parrots. No need to find anything to contradict it. I have to wonder why you are trying so hard to prove that a baby parrot would have a stressfull life with its owners because of some trauma in its past. Every study will find stress causes problems, and of course that would be expected, and in fact needed for their survival.
I survived a bad tornado when I was a child and it blew me blocks away from home and I still feel fear when the wind blows stongly. Why wouldnt any animal be the same? However, that does not mean I need extra special care the rest of my life, or unable to have a normal healthy life, or die earlier, only because I feel stress with heavy winds. I would never tell a parrot owner, that their loved baby, will have problems, even have a shorter life, because they had some stress early on. I dont have a fortune telling degree to do this. I have seen baby parrots, become so well adusted that the earlier traumatic stess could not even be seen.
Finches are not parrots. Finches will never have the kind of trust with owners that a parrot can. Nature has enabled baby animals to overcome many stresses to be functioning well enough to live sucessfully in their environments. The vast majority of traumatized baby parrots will overcome most anything.

I am not trying 'hard' to prove anything. I am simple referring to a scientific study which Seagoatdeb asked the link for.
Now, as to your arguments, no, finches are not parrots but then rats are not people and we use them on human studies. This is common in science. The argument that a study done on another avian species is not valid on parrots is a common one but the fact is that there are very few studies done on parrots and will continue to be for the simple reason that parrots live too long and researchers cannot wait years and years to publish or they would all die of starvation. Finches are used all the time as subjects of all kinds of avian studies (if I remember correctly, Michael was involved in a couple of them dealing with behavior when he was working at the university) because of their short lifespan and rapid reproduction rate. And, unfortunately, the fact that stress causes parrots to live less was proven by a study on African Grays although it had nothing to do with infancy stress but the stress of living without another parrot as companion.
Last but not least (and this is really not a criticism but a point that needs to be made), one cannot really use a personal example as argument against a scientific study findings because one cannot possibly be as objective when it comes to self-analysis than a scientist is about measurable results (we are talking about actual levels of hormones measured).
As to your experience with traumatized baby parrots, personally, I don't often use my perception of things as an argument when it comes to parrots supposed happiness or stress because although I try to be objective, the truth of the matter is that none of us, no matter how long we have had parrots or how many, is prepared to make a valid pronouncement on this. We simply do not instinctually identify or even recognize the manifestation of the feelings as we could do with a dog, for example. We can give our own, uninformed opinion on it but it really has no scientific value, does it? I know mine doesn't and that's why I go to scientific studies.