Wolf,
Do you have acess to the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science articles, either through a subscription or through a subscription through work/a local library/univeristy? That's where the peer reviewed paper that "article" refers to is published.
Here's a link to the abstract:
http://m.pnas.org/content/111/39/14153.abstractThis paper absolutely does not say the virus is incorporated into the genome of the rosellas and exhibits in the feathers. Which is what that "article" makes it sound like. The birds are not the virus, they just have the virus; some die, some survive. They catch it just like any other bird would, through the normal transmission route dander etc. This 8 year research shows that non hybrid Rosellas carry high viral loads and that the virus acts as selection pressure for speciation (or at least hybridization) of that particular ring complex of birds. Some people can carry high loads of various pathogens, and shed them and expose other humans without showing clinical signs. That's where my complaint about science communication arose, "they" (poor journalist/non-science people writing about science...) will often interpret things wrong, or in a way that will draw the most attention.
I'll see what I can do about uploading a pdf copy of the actual research article being referenced. I can't link to the full text bc it requires a subscription.... Maybe I'll print it and scan it then link it...
As for if US bred rosellas are high load carriers like their Australian relatives.... I'm not well versed in the importation and control of disease in breeding birds, so I can't agree/disagree with anyone on this.