by Pajarita » Sat Feb 21, 2015 11:35 am
Hmmm, for one thing, I would not be 100% sure of that because we have found lately (as science in general and ornithology knowledge in particular has become better) that animals like birds, reptiles, insects, etc would, sometimes, use a different organ, receptor or biological path different than mammals for a comparable function (avian vision pathway between the eye and the brain or certain cognitive functions which originate in a completely different part of the brain for birds than mammals, for example).
But, on the other hand, it makes sense because nature eliminates anything that is not necessary (as in the case of penguins and dolphins taste receptors -not needed because they swallow their food whole) so, for example, obligate carnivores (like cats) don't taste sweet for the simple reason that they don't need it as all they eat is meat. And, on the other hand, it also eliminates something that would just create a problem -like, for example, eliminating a bird's ability to taste hot spicy food which, in reality, it's not a flavor but a burning sensation to the capsaicin which is not a protein (flavor receptors are protein 'switches') but a lipid molecule related to what gives vanilla its flavor so the bird can disseminate the plants seeds- or alter their 'sensitivity' as is the case with the glucosinolates (the compound that makes cabbages bitter). So it is entirely possible that nature eliminated the sweet receptors because sweet is not the taste of poison (it's bitter and humans have 25 different receptors for bitter) so, for a bird, tasting sweet is not necessary.