Cage Cleaner wrote:You need to read our posts more carefully. I feel that you make many assumptions about what we say that simply aren't there. It's quite a bit of misinterpretation.
I have based my responses purely on what you have typed. I have not made any assumptions.
The example with Cheeky is that she said she doesn't need to use the same kind of positive punishment with the SPECIFIC thoroughbred as with the other horses. It wasn't a contradiction. I have myself mentioned that training strategy differs with each horse.
Actually her statement was: "I would never do it with my thoroughbred as he would have a mental break down".
Why would the horse have a mental breakdown? Why does she think the horse would respond differently? Why wouldn't horses other than a thoroughbred have a "mental breakdown" if smacked or kicked? The statement that it's ok to do it to most horses, but not this one b/c it could be affected mentally is contradictory.
And the example you bring up as a highlight in your latest post specifically states that that method is used when a horse exhibits dominant behavior.
Does it matter when it's used? You say that like "it's ok to hit sometimes, but not others". Try applying that mentality to a child or another pet. You can't.
Before we go on, please go back and read these posts again. If you are still confused about what is said, and continue to find supposed contradictions, feel free to ask me questions.
I'm not confused at all, and I have read your posts several times to make sure I understand what you're saying. It seems pretty clear to me.
But, as this is a parrot forum, and not a horse-training forum, I have to say that I don't think there is much of a point in continuing this conversation.
Maybe YOU should go back and read YOUR posts. You were the one who brought animal training other than parrots into the conversation. You said "For horses, dogs, cats, etc., the right reaction would be reacting in a dominant manner". You are completely wrong in this assumption. It has been proven by behaviour scientists to be a complete MYTH to combating "dominant behaviour" or more appropriately termed "aggressive behaviour".
That said, this is Michael's forum, and this is in the "off topic" area, so if he wishes this discussion be stopped, then he has every right to intervene, and if he asked, I would certainly curb my posts.
You are right to agree that dominant theory and punishment styles of training don't work on birds, and I am here to point out to you that they are NOT needed in training ANY other animals, including dogs, cats, and horses.
I'm also finding that I am having to correct your assumptions, and continuously clarifying myself every time I have to post. So, I apologize but I am not finding anything to be had from this.
You haven't "corrected" a single statement I have made. It seems to me that you want to defend your position, which is why you keep responding to my posts.
I understand that you have quite a bit of pride in the links that you posted. I did scan them, but I didn't find anything that convinced my otherwise, due to what I know from my own personal experience from working with horses. I also couldn't find the citations for sources used for these websites.
Some of the links I posted were their own source and authority on the matter. I have already said I can't change your mind, but I can and will disagree with you.
And, I'm sure many people have great ideas about how to train horses, and that there are indeed many ways of doing so. However, the trainer I work for is working with horses that are competing at the -very highest- level of our discipline, and doing extremely well at even this level. One of the mares just won the Grand Prix event a little bit ago. I believe I have face-to-face access to a very well-reputed source.
I don't doubt your ability or achievements or success with the methods which you employ. However, the irony in your statement is that you are using your horse's achievements as a merit to why you believe it's ok to hit a horse. I don't think that's ok.
So, please excuse my confidence in what I believe in, and excuse the fact that I use personal anecdotes.
Your confidence is noted.