by lwis » Tue Jan 31, 2012 8:07 pm
This debate is similar to a "parenting stlyes" debate. Some people micromanage their children putting them in as many extracurricular activities as possible, some are more militant with their children, some parents don't let their children play outside by themselves for fear they will get snatched up by a predator, some put their children on leashes, some parents are more lenient and let there children have more freedom.
There are many ways of raising children and many ways of raising parrots. I think most parents and 'parronts' do what they do out of love or because they believe it to be in the best interest of whoever or whatever they are caring for.
There are pros and cons to whatever way one decides to keep a parrot.
It is pretty crazy how he flies so many birds at once. And I agree that they do travel in very small cages (the one with the greys could have been a little larger), but they didn't seem to be attacking each other, and I did not see any birds who were plucked or that looked to be in bad shape. Perhaps they have learned to tolerate the less than ideal travel situations, knowing that they will be able to fly and flock for what looked like quite a long time.
This is not to say that they have the most ideal living situations, but the videos may not necessarily show everything. It is really hard to say what the best life would be for a pet parrot. Who is better off? -The single parrot who has a big cage all to himself, with all the toys and human interaction he could want? Or multiple birds living in a house, with separate cages, separate toys, separate food, and separate play time? Or the ones you see in the video, who fly in flocks of whoever they want to fly with and seem to happily fly back when they should? Or any other living situation in between?
It would be difficult to determine what would be best for a bird that is not in it's wild environment.
We can, for the most part, tell if something is wrong if there are behavioural or visible heath problems present. But, aside from that, if a bird is showing content body language and is not excessively biting, we can only imagine that the bird is 'happy' or at least not displeased with his current environment. But only the bird knows how he perceives his world, I suppose.
As far as these birds not demonstrating the highest level of parrot intelligence or complex behaviour capability, who cares? Honestly, the fact that a bird has the capability to play basketball, or ring toss, or any other novelty miniature human activity certainly does not mean that they are any worse off if they do not learn them. Sure it's impressive when a bird can do some neat conditioned behaviour on command, but I think the motive for teaching a bird complex tricks is more of an egocentric one.
I agree that a bird likely benefits psychologically from learning some tricks and some trick training is important in order to have a better behaved bird, but the bird did not just start doing the tricks on his own one day. What is more impressive is that the owner is able to get the bird to do the complex trick. I am sure people are quite proud of themselves when their bird can display a desired behaviour on command. I am too when I teach my bird something. But do these birds in the video ever think to themselves while free flying around, "boy, I wish I was taught how to do complicated tricks"? Who knows...probably not. All I am saying is, that demonstrating a parrot's highest level of intelligence benefits the owner's ego more than it benefits the parrot. As long as the bird seems content, who cares? Some would argue that simpler and wilder are good things.