seagoatdeb wrote:Here is an article that tells you how to correctly dehydrate to preserve nutrition.
http://foreverhealthy.net/resources/art ... n-enzymes/Dehydrating leaves more nutrition than cooked but it does remove water, so that neeeds to be taken into account. When I make raw smoothies for myself, I eat a dehydrated cracker with them, perfect companions. When my parrots get some dehydrated seed crackers, they are served with raw fruits.
The link on the second posting (the one above) actually contradicts the one on the first posting in terms of temperatures although the second one only talks about enzymes while the first one talks about general nutrition. It also references Viktoras Kulvinskas who, although self-proclaimed the 'father' of the raw diet, actually has no formal training or degrees in nutrition (he is a mathematician) not that this, per se, means that the man is a cuckoo but, added to the fact that he's a Bishop in some weird church that makes the raw diet part of their liturgy and that states that this diet was what made 'essenes' who lived before Christ live to be 120 years old... well, I don't mean to be rude but it kind of strains credibility, no?). The other link is an ad for dehydrated products... I might sound cynical but salespeople will always tell you that their product is great.
The chart I was referring to was actually a comparison between frozen, dehydrated and cooked. Here it is:http://nutritiondata.self.com/topics/processing
And, as an interesting note, freeze-dried actually retains more phytochemicals than dehydrated and, in some cases, almost as many vitamins. See this:
http://preventcancer.aicr.org/site/News ... 7&abbr=pr_and this: