There was a discussion recently in another thread about the claims some pellet manufacturers make that their product is a "complete diet." I agree that this claim is questionable at best (I'm sure a bird could live quite a while on just fortified pellets, but it wouldn't necessarily be very happy), but it got me thinking about some of the more ridiculous claims bird food manufacturers (and manufacturers of other products as well) make.
Example: Now, don't get me wrong, I think Lafeber Nutri-berries are a good product and I give one or two a day to my parrot as treats. The Garden Veggie and Sunny Orchard varieties in particular are quite healthy ingredient-wise and good for foraging and beak health as well. That said, I noticed recently that on their website they claim that "96% of the berry gets eaten." (http://www.lafeber.com/pinnacle/index.php?p=catalog&parent=24&pg=1) LOL. I am sure anyone who has actually watched a bird eat and knows what a Nutri-berry is realizes that this number is totally absurd. In a couple of non-scientific trials, I observed Winnie to eat about 40% of a Nutri-berry by weight before moving on, and based on what I've seen from other birds that seems like a realistic number. I wonder whether a parrot has ever eaten 96% of anything, to be honest. Just an absolutely ridiculous number and I'd really like to know how they reached it.
What are some other absurd claims made by makers of bird products?








