jayebird wrote:If I had a dog right now, there are things I would not do. I would not have a doggie door to the outside world so that he could run and run and run free in the roads and yards, as one might say a dog should, whenever he so chooses. I would not take him on a walk through the city streets or on a hike without a collar and a leash.
If you want to talk about dogs vs parrots, then a better analogy is that food management/training is like teaching a dog not to destroy the furniture or go in certain areas. Clipping is more like tying a dog on a very short leash in the house and never allowing it to go anywhere beyond that except when the owner comes and moves it. Maybe an even better analogy would be the above while adding a choke or zap collar because flight attempts are futile and punishing.
jayebird wrote:Also, stop saying that the bird is punished with pain for its flight attempts because you think it crashes to the ground and immediately gets hurt. A properly clipped bird simply flutters and can land safely - no pain, no punishment.
This is irrelevant. It is still punishment. A clipped bird learns that it cannot fly to where it wants to go so it tries to fly less. This is punishment, the reduction of behavior. Only when the clip is light or the bird is a good flier that this punishment is ineffective. Cmon, if clipping wasn't to punish the bird it would be pretty silly. The bird would try to fly like 50 times every day forever and it would be pretty bad and difficult for the owner. However, it is done with the knowledge that it will teach the bird to not even try to fly (for the most part, reflex is different), therefore it is punishment.
jayebird wrote:Stop saying that a clipped bird is not a real bird. A dog on a leash, without a canine pack, not roaming free and hunting deer, is not a real dog? An indoor cat is not a cat?
Clipped parrots don't express one of the most characteristic behaviors of their class: flight. You cannot begin to understand avian behavior and what they're like without it. When flighted, they behave totally different (their real selves) than clipped. Clipping creates a state of helplessness and dependence that is not at all what parrots are like. The dog and cat examples are pointless because they can still run around the house, they can still hunt rodents, they can still exhibit, even if limited, their natural instincts. A flighted parrot in a limited environment can also at least to some extent exhibit it's more natural way of life (obviously not to the complete extent but it can fly away from the owner when it doesn't want something which is not the case with clipped). I think I heard someone else say that if you want to compare a dog to a clipped parrot, you should try tying it up to a tree.
Since these differences are so drastic, saying what works on clipped parrots out of their helplessness does not necessarily what works for parrots in general because flighted parrots may always respond to that kind of treatment by flying away. However, if you look at what training works on flighted parrots, bringing it back to clipped parrots works well and is probably psychologically less harmful.
jayebird wrote:Stop calling clipping a physically abusive action. It doesn't hurt. Feathers are fingernails.
You really really missed the point.
jayebird wrote:But I also must admit that I need the ability to put him in his cage even if he'd rather stay out and play - because I need to go to work or something - and I don't want to fight with him about it and risk, well...a chase and crash landing.
I admit I've made mistakes. I share them so others might not make them. However, we've solved these problems. My birds gladly fly to me for the
opportunity to go back in their cages because of the way I have their schedule set up. I'm not starving them. They are just used to the routine of 10AM/9PM time to fly to me to be put back into cage. I'll admit it's tougher at other times and they are less likely to fly to me just to be put away. However, I don't have any issues with this any more. They will step up or let me grab them to be put away. I think Truman just needed more time getting used to routine, recall, and trusting me and it was my fault for being too used to Kili and rushing him.
jayebird wrote:Also, fun fact, Mango's got a pretty good recall despite being non-flighted. He'll skitter across the whole apartment on the floor to get to us if we're in the kitchen, or he'll race across the desk and over obstacles just to be on our hand. I like that he does that regardless of "potential for food."
You sure this is recall? Just sounds like following around. It's really easy to get a parrot (more likely flighted) to follow you around cause it's curious. It's a heck of a lot harder to get it to come to you where and when you want it to. Two very different things.
jayebird wrote:If you want to talk about "natural" feeding habits for your bird...[color=#0000FF]Forage-free-feeding is truly the most accurate way to replicate a parrot's wild environment, because in the wild they are neither food-managed nor do they sit at a bowl all day.
I totally agree with foraging. It's a great solution for many people. I don't do it because I flight train and trick train. I use the same mental mechanism but I change the method of attaining it (doing tricks, etc). Foraging is more natural but the benefit of trick training is that it helps the bird bond with the owner more and teaches it useful behavior (recall, handling, etc).
As for Mona, she has an entire room dedicated to her parrots. She has to deal with flock dynamics and other issues all the time. We talk about this a lot. However, there is much less behavior management required when the birds aren't flying free around your entire home. Mona cages most of her parrots when she brings them into her living room (but considering she lets them fly around the bird room, I think is a reasonable compromise). As for myself and Adel, we have our birds living in the same room as us so it's a completely different story. We didn't take away their ability to be a bird. Instead we've made changes to our household environment, we've made changes to our routines, we've done training, etc. It may sound like a lot but deciding on making the changes is a bigger component of it because when you're used to it, it just works (mostly).
jayebird wrote:We do trick training with Mango and he's out and around people and well behaved. No lack of interest on his part. You say that you under-feed to improve trick training...and that's simply not required. Mango's a fast learner who works for special treats or cuddles and is also a free-feeder.
Advanced and flighted tricks do require it. The basic tricks can be taught this way but when it comes to puzzles, color ring sorting, and flying, it seems they need that extra boost of motivation. It's like Kili's brain turns on when she is hungry. She may attempt the color sort when she's not hungry but she just can't get the colors right. Then when she's hungry she gets it all on the first try. It's like the brain needs that element of hunger to go full drive. Same thing with flight. Getting a flight recall or two without withholding food is possible. But not going to happen a lot of times because the energy required to do the flights exceeds the rewards (toys, attention, etc).
jayebird wrote:[b]You can't criticize people who use negative reinforcement [we don't, btw] and in the same breath say that you under-feed your birds so that they have to obey you and work for their food by doing what you want them to do.
This doesn't make any sense. I use negative reinforcement. I think it is useful. I just don't think it is as effective as primary reinforcement or should be used excessively.
jayebird wrote:You can't criticize people who clip their birds' wings for "limiting their choices and forcing them into things" and in the same breath you under-feed your birds so that they have that much more motivation to trick train and learn to do things that are unnatural or that they might really not want to do because they need/want that food. You're just using another method to "force the bird".
Ok, now you're just being stupid. Comparing the kind of force by shifting feeding and giving choices vs entirely clipping wings with no way of undoing it for some time are incomparable. Limiting their feeding to specific times of the day and/or as reward for specific behaviors still lets them eat as much as they need, without overfeeding, and helps shape their behavior for living in a human environment. This is just a matter of shifting the timing and consequences of food intake. So instead of eating a little at a time all day for no reason, the bird gets to eat when it catches itself performing specific behaviors and during routine feeding times. The birds adapt to the routine and expect their food at those times (and they get it). As for doing tricks, flight, etc, they are free to refuse. They are not so starved that they will die if they don't do it (or even have health problems for that matter as long as it is done safely). They will just have to wait until the routine time to get it. But usually they like the treats and I'm guessing that outweighs the hardship of doing the behaviors so they do it. But they want the treats because they didn't just eat a moment before and can't have anything. It's like eating a huge meal and you're stuffed and then someone offers desert. You either don't want it or overeat by eating it.
Furthermore, parrots have a crop. They have about 2 days of food in there to go on before they begin eating into their body reserves. So withholding food for one half of one day just means they deplete their amount a little before replenishing it. Certainly they'll have a desire to fill it back up but by no means is their stomach or body being deprived of food. Think of it as restocking your refrigerator before it runs empty. You still have food but you don't want to have nothing left so you go shopping before it is empty.
But comparing clipping to this is stupid. Clipping completely eliminates flight and choices. The bird is helpless and at your mercy. Food management shifts the weight of those choices and imitates scarcity in the environment. When less food can be found (like a drought or famine), the bird will try harder to get the food. The difference with captive food managed birds is that if they refuse to train, they still have the safety net of cage feeding to fall back on. So they completely have the choice whether to participate and get instant reward or not participate and wait a little (their digestive system is not running empty because they have a crop). The clipped bird has absolutely no choice in terms of flying away to escape danger (which is their reflex to do) and it has to do anything the owner instills on them. If the owner puts the bird here or puts it there, it has to accept it. The only thing they have left is biting but it's easy for you to ignore a little bird and make it realize that even biting is futile (may not be the case with bigger birds which is why I think clipping makes birds way more aggressive). Clipping forces a bird not to get any flight related exercise, their muscles atrophy, their cardio-respiratory systems barely get any exercise. But I think the most demeaning and abusive thing of all is that clipped owners force their parrots to do things with a "because I said so" attitude (which has been very evident in some other responses). Much of the "parrotness" is flooded out of the parrot with clipping and punishment.
If you're going to compare which is more cruel, inhibiting, or detrimental to a parrot, then clearly clipping is because if affects far more facets of its life and in absolute ways. It makes no sense why you would bring up an argument like this because it only demonstrates how much more overwhelming and unreasonable your way of dealing with a specific issue is. One is completely forceful without any choice to the parrot that entirely changes the parrot while the other increases the likelihood of an outcome but still giving the parrot the choice not to. If food management isn't solving an issue, it is a folly to think it requires more food management (if it was done sufficiently to increase motivation for other comparable behavior), then it requires a different training approach or environmental adjustment. Clipping has no calibration, the bird either is or isn't (I know there are limited or partial clips but there is a certain breaking point where the parrot does fly to where it wants to go and where it can't).
jayebird wrote:Mango wakes up around 5 am and we wake up around 8 on weekdays (a bit later on weekends) and we're pretty sure he does a looot of eating in those wee hours. Hey, I wake up hungry, too. What kind of cruel animal owner would I be if I made him wait 3 hours after waking up to get a bite to eat? And just because I'm not willing to wake up at 5am to fill his bowl and then go back to bed does not make me a bad bird owner. That's why we decided to change/refill his food and water in the evenings.
Nothing cruel about that. If bakery owners discard leftovers at 8AM and the pigeons flock to eat then, that's when it happens. I think parrots learn to adapt to the timing of their environment for when to eat as well. My preference though is to cover the cages and use lights on timers to tune the environmental parameters to my work schedule. It's not natural, but the bird doesn't really know the difference. And as previously mentioned, they'll still have food in their crop at this time so it's more of a matter of replenishing the reserve rather than keeping the stomach from running out. It's like a little gas tank they have with them and they want to fill it up before it runs empty to minimize their risk of running out, however, it's not harmful to deplete it more before refilling it as long as it is never forced to run empty.
jayebird wrote:I also agree with Entranced about being "flexible" and with Roz about life happening. I do not train at 5:37pm, sharp, Tuesdays-Thursdays...we train when we feel like it. I don't want him to expect it because I'm not always going to be able to be there. If he expects it and it doesn't happen that can be very traumatizing psychologically. It might be because I had to stay late at work, or even because I just don't feel like it at the time. The same with feeding. God forbid I have to stay late, my fiance's caught in traffic...and my poor bird is at home waiting for his scheduled mealtime?
Unlike us, they have a crop. On rainy days they may get little or no feeding in the wild. It's natural for them to deal with things (but I don't recommend pushing it, just the occasional honest accident). I'm very careful about coming home in time to feed them and for the vast vast most part this has paid off. I don't make commitments that could make me late to feed my birds. If I know ahead of time, I leave more food that day. The rare accidental lateness is no big deal and I think they should learn to deal with that too. They just may end up running their crop down more than usual before they get fed.
jayebird wrote:It works for us. We're not going to change. I've outlined my reasons and beliefs and opinions and justified my decisions for my family. My bird and I communicate our needs and wants and we live together happily and healthily. Stop being so aggressive at people. Stop implying that certain people don't deserve their birds because they don't agree with or choose to use your methods.
Oh, I don't really care that much about how people manage their parrots food. It's just that a lot of people were saying how they see no reason to manage the food, that they don't have to keep their parrots from flying all over the place or the need to recall them, then it turned out that it was because they decided to completely eliminate their ability to fly all together. The arguments you and others have been using against food management are all the result of a far crueler thing you've done to your parrot. You play the innocence card about dealing with food (all day rather than at certain times of the day, and nothing more) when you are depriving your parrot so much more!
Depriving it of choice, instinct, exercise, happiness (I don't necessarily believe this as a behavioralist but I think many other people who keep their parrots flighted will tell you it makes their parrots happier), when so much of their anatomy and lifestyle revolves around flight in my opinion is cruel. It's already bad enough we keep them in cages most of the time, but not letting them fly when they are out ends up entirely withholding something they really need. Withholding food some of the time is surely much less cruel than withholding flight all of the time.
Unless you can show me a flighted parrot entirely trained not to ever fly, it is very clear that parrots choose to fly as much as they choose to eat. Taking a little bit of food away is far less harmful than taking that flight away entirely. Both may be done for selfish self-interest of maintaining order in our human household, but the clipped parrot gets the short end of the stick! Clipped parrots are far more likely to develop health, plucking, and aggression issues. Shifting feeding time does nothing of this because the bird has a crop to take food from for longer than food is being withheld. You couldn't deal with keeping a bird (whether it was training, changing your environment a little, etc), so you decided to take it in your hands not to let it be a bird any more.