Michael wrote:Are you certain that these mechanisms don't merely serve as attention and thus positively reinforce the undesired behavior?
Supposing the bird isn't doing the behavior for attention per se, but already HAS attention and is doing it because it is self-reinforcing (allopreening). In that case, interrupting the behavior in some way would not be reinforcing and could serve as a minor deterrent. It certainly worked with Scooter for exactly the behavior the OP was concerned about. I coupled it with copious positive reinforcement for a more gentle approach.
It seems to me that if parrots are intelligent, they can just as easily learn that behaviors result in undesirable consequences as desirable consequences. It seems to me that one just has to be VERY careful because it is easy to 1) hurt the bird) 2) damage trust or 3) get it wrong and actually give a consequence that is perceived as desirable. I know punishment is a word that doesn't go over well in the modern world, and it is certainly true that corporal punishment is a bad idea with a being as fragile as a bird, but after years of being told that horses are "negative reinforcement animals" I personally believe that any creature capable of learning can learn via any of the approaches. The trick is maximizing the odds of getting the right approach for the creature and behavior you are addressing. With parrots, that means think positive reinforcement first, but that doesn't mean you can never, ever consider if other methods might not also be effective.