Pajarita wrote:Seagoatdeb, I don't want to debate you but you continue to use statements that are not 100% accurate and which are confusing. Scientific theories are proven by data, it's hypothesis that are completely unproven. Hypothesis come first, then comes the gathering of all data related to every aspect of the theory and, if the data all agrees, it becomes a scientific theory and an accepted fact. And what I stated is what is taught nowadays by universities (I gave you the links). And I am sorry that you think I am condescending but maybe you should consider that you are in a very small minority of people who think so. The written word is iffy at best because the reader can put any sort of accent, tone or ulterior motive to it. Personally, I try to read everything in a neutral tone - it works for me.
You are, of course, within your right to express your opinion but when you say that a theory that is currently widely accepted as a fact by science is 'controversial', you are using a word that people understand to mean that both beliefs are on a par and that there is a debate going on between scientists as to which one is the right one- and this is not so. There might be people who don't believe in it, as you do, and, for all we know, they might be right but, right now, there is no debate so there is no real controversy. And the accepted theory is that birds descend from dinosaurs. It's not that this is MY opinion and that I don't accept anybody else's opinion because I am right and they are wrong, it's that this is the consensual opinion of the greatest majority of people who know much more than I do and I bow to their greater knowledge.
Once it becomes a scientific theory it is still a theory..the best that can ever be said is it is a good theory but never a fact.....it is based on facts....but it is what is accepted as a good explanation...
This is a growing science that changes theories a lot and not all agree so there is indeed controversy. I do believe that parrots came from what they call dinosaurs. They lump all the ancient animals into that term right now. The only way i differ is where you start to call it an ancient bird. This does not even have to do with parrot care. That should not bother you for me to have my opinion and I have never negated yours. You have a right to your opinion and viewpoint and I would defend that. I dont understand why you are complelled to coment on my posts and decide you are the authority that knows what is right. You cant even be 100 percent right, on this kind of topic, it isnt even possible. People are not stupid, they will read through all the coments and make their own decisions.
But please dont coment anymore on my post unless you can use what the forum has in its rules. RESPECT Add me to foes and dont look at my posts if you cant resist. I do not want to argue or debate, especially on something that has no real relevance for us today for our parrrots. I am done on this one, i have answered you and done my best to try to let us both have an opinion. i am not comenting anymore on this post, since it takes two to argue. So let have peace.